Does Substantive Democratization Create More Committed Democrats? Surprising Evidence from Africa

Matthew D. Fails. 2009. Democratization 16 (5): 841–866.

Abstract

A growing body of evidence holds that citizens support democracy when they believe the regime has provided individual freedoms and political rights. Put simply, citizens develop legitimacy attitudes by learning about democracy. These findings, however, are based on citizens’ evaluations of the procedural elements of democracy. Democratization also entails substantive reforms that likely impact legitimacy attitudes. This article provides the first test of how the success – and failure – of substantive democratization shapes legitimacy attitudes. Using data from the second round of Afrobarometer surveys, I find surprising results. Citizens who judge the regime to be more successful in substantive democratization are actually less likely to be committed democrats. I conclude with possible explanations of these surprising findings and reflect on the challenges for both future research and for the new democracies facing this situation.

Cite (BibTeX)
@article{fails2009substantive,
  title = {Does Substantive Democratization Create More Committed Democrats? Surprising Evidence from Africa},
  author = {Matthew D. Fails},
  year = {2009},
  journal = {Democratization},
  volume = {16},
  number = {5},
  pages = {841--866},
  doi = {10.1080/13510340903162077},
  url = {https://matthewfails.github.io/matthewfails-site/publication/substantive-democratization-africa/}
}

See Also