Oil Income and the Personalization of Autocratic Politics
. 2019. Political Science Research and Methods 8 (4): 772–779.
Abstract
Personalist regimes are more reliant on natural resource rents than other models of autocracy, but the direction of causation is unclear. Resource wealth could finance patronage and allow leaders to skip construction of institutionalized systems of rule, leading to more personalized autocracies. Conversely, personalist leaders may increase resource extraction, since diversifying the economy could increase the power of rivals. I use data on the degree of personalism and level of oil income to disentangle these interpretations. The results show that increases in oil income are associated with subsequent increases in personalism within autocracies. Since personalist regimes are less likely to successfully democratize, the results also provide important evidence as to why oil impedes democracy.
Cite (BibTeX)
@article{fails2019oil,
title = {Oil Income and the Personalization of Autocratic Politics},
author = {Matthew D. Fails},
year = {2019},
journal = {Political Science Research and Methods},
volume = {8},
number = {4},
pages = {772--779},
doi = {10.1017/psrm.2019.14},
url = {https://matthewfails.github.io/matthewfails-site/publication/oil-personalization/}
}See Also
- [Dataset] Replication Data for: Oil Income and the Personalization of Autocratic Politics (2019)
- [Paper] When Does Oil Harm Child Mortality? (2021)
- [Dataset] Replication Data for: When Does Oil Harm Child Mortality? (2020)
- [Dataset] Replication Data for: Resources, Rent Diversification, and the Collapse of Autocratic Regimes (2020)
- [Paper] Resources, Rent Diversification, and the Collapse of Autocratic Regimes (2015)
- [Paper] What Types of Political Regimes Subsidize Fuel Consumption? (2022)
- [Dataset] Replication Data for: What Types of Political Regimes Subsidize Fuel Consumption? (2022)
- [Review] Review of Power Grab: Political Survival through Extractive Resource Nationalization, by Paasha Mahdavi (2020)